Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Veronica: Developing Genuine Character

Welcome Veronica to Darcyholic Diversions!
Hi, Darcyholics!  I am very happy to introduce Veronica to you today.  I met Veronica on Twitter!  And that was when I hardly knew what a 'tweet' was.  I have enjoyed getting to know her, and her quirky sense of humor as well as her love for the 'Dark Side' of Austen!  I hope you enjoy getting to know here today!

Upcoming Guest Posts Are As Follows:
May 4--Susan Adriani
May 8--Annette W.
May 11--Beth Massey
May 13--Matt Duffy
May 15--Erlynn K.
May 18--Rebecca T.
May 22--Candy M. (So Little Time...)
May 25--Karen Cox
May 29--Jan Ashe
June 1--Kara Louise
June 5--Sharon Lathan
June 8--Gayle Mills
June 12--Shannon Winslow
June 15--Karen Wasylowski
June 19--Krista Bagley
June 22--Stephanie Hamm
June 26--Laurel Ann Nattress
June 29--Pam Dixon
July 3--Jennifer Petkus
July 6--Karen Aminada
July 10--Marilyn Brant
July 13--Meredith Esparanza
And Many more to come!

Comments on Veronica's post will be entered into the monthly drawings here on Darcyholic Diversions.  Entries will be based on comments on blog posts; but additional chances will be given for joining this site, tweeting this post, Joining this site as a member!, sharing this on Facebook or your blog, Friend me on Facebook, clicking 'like’ on Barbara Tiller Cole, Author's Facebook page, Join Darcyholic Diversions Facebook Page or following BarbTCole on Twitter.
Developing Genuine Character  
Fitzwilliam Darcy for all his wealth and good looks did not make a winning first impression upon the people of Meryton, Elizabeth Bennet, or me. To be honest I had been thoroughly won over by Colonel Brandon before I ever met Mr. Darcy. However, there is something quite intoxicating about Mr. Darcy that finally got to me in the end. 

My introduction to Jane Austen came in college when I was taking Women in Fiction and Literature Study for fun. Even though I have always loved reading, Jane Austen had somehow slipped through the cracks of my public school education, and I just never found her on my own prior to that semester in college. Literature was my mental escape from the rigors of my Psychology major, one I sought so often as to acquire enough credits to claim English as a minor.

It was in that class that I read my first Jane Austen novel, which happened to be Sense and Sensibility. I fell in love with the devotion and consistency of Colonel Brandon. Even when he had nothing to gain by his actions his kindness, integrity, and decency were unwavering. He was not dashing, not the kind of man to sweep a woman off her feet, but to me that made him all the more appealing. He seemed the kind of man to take a woman gently by the hand and never let go. 

After a man like that coming across Mr. Darcy at the Meryton Ball set my teeth on edge. I mean, here was this supposed gentleman standing aloof and not even really being all that pleasant to his own friend. Then he makes unflattering comments about Elizabeth with her in ear shot, obviously not even paying the courtesy of noticing enough to restrain his censure. This was a man of character and breeding?

I am sure that most of my bias came from my fondness of Colonel Brandon, and that old saying that if you cannot say anything nice then you should not say anything at all, but then we wouldn’t have had a story with the character development to transform a dislikable man into one to swoon for. That is what Jane Austen did with Mr. Darcy for me. 

Many have commented on her fidelity to realistic characters and situations, and her observations about human nature play right into my psychological awareness. She blends my two interests well, psychology and storytelling. Character development is very similar to a psychological study, though with less technical jargon and more sympathetic and empathetic connection. 

 Colonel Brandon’s consistency is admirable. At no point does he ever really act out of spite, which is what I will never stop adoring about him. Mr. Darcy, however, is transformed through Pride and Prejudice. He does not do a complete one-eighty. Instead he becomes more genuinely the gentleman he is reported to be. The fact that Elizabeth is the catalyst is what makes Mr. Darcy truly swoon worthy. 

Basically, it was her words bringing his attention to the discrepancy between his pride in being a gentleman and his actions regarding how he has shown himself to be a gentleman, or as she points out his not acting as a true gentleman. He internalized her words, thought about them and used them to really look at himself. He then began to truly act the part of a gentleman. 

 When a man is willing to listen to a woman and take her words to heart, that is a very heady thing. How can any woman not be won by a man of such genuine integrity as that? It was not easy for him to hear, but he did listen. All his actions after that became those of a true gentleman, even when he was not sure he had anything to gain by them with the woman who made such a profound positive impression upon him. That is what won me over with Mr. Darcy.

 Jane Austen is not noted for her darkness as a writer, but when looking at human nature there is an element of darkness because we do not always act with kindness towards others. In all of Austen’s works we see this kind of darkness in the guise of classism. Monsters tend to be the symbolic representation of the darkest aspects of human nature, the seven deadly sins amplified. With the surge in parody mash-ups, particularly the ones with the works of Austen infusing vampires, werewolves and the like, how could I not be interested in this new path of exploration? That is what sparked my founding the Dark Jane Austen Book Club with my friend Sarah.

We take a look at these mash-ups, compare Austen’s original works, and look at the darkness that lies within while laughing at the absurdity and juxtaposition. Reading critically and seriously considering how character development takes place does not have to mean being boringly serious.


  1. That is very fascinating insight about how Col. Brandon and then, Mr. Darcy, struck you when you first read them. Thanks for sharing!

    1. I'm glad to share. I enjoy digging at character to figure out what makes them likable or not.

  2. I really enjoyed reading your comments on Jane.'s darkness in her writing.

    1. She may not have given her monsters fangs or claws, but the prejudices some of Jane Austen's characters exhibit shows a callousness that is more monster at heart.

  3. Veronica:

    Thank you so much for your very thought-filled post. I DO see the brightness and the loyalty of Colonel Brandon, and Mr. Knightley for that matter. I do think that one of the things I like about Mr. Darcy WAS his willingness to look at his character and be willing to change. For me, part of it is creates a 'dream' of sorts that there might be some of the 'characters' in my current life that might actually look at them selves and change.

    I also, liked your thoughts about the symbolic nature of the dark characters in some of the sequels/mashups that you and your blog follow. And I am grateful that you have been interested in my P&P/Christmas Carol mashup! Thanks again for your willingness to post here!

    Barbara Tiller Cole

    1. So glad to have the opportunity, Barbara, and looking forward to delving into your book come December with my fellow Dark Jane Austen Book Club members.

  4. I agree that Colonel Brandon is definitely The Man in S&S, but I wonder what your first impression was of Edward Ferrers. He's supposed to be admirable due to his steadfastness in keeping his promise to Lucy Steele, yet most S&S fanfic is about Brandon, or the occasional "reformed Willoughby" fic.

    ~ Junewilliams

    1. To be quite honest, Edward was nice, but he never captured my heart. He seemed presented as a man of steadfast honor, but not one of a truly steadfast heart. True he was young when he made his promise to Lucy, and I have no doubt that his feelings for Elinor are sincere; however, with the presence of Colonel Brandon and even Willoughby if it weren't for Elinor's thinking of him he would quite fade into the background completely.

  5. I agree that Darcy changing is about the damn sexiest thing ever. At the moment Lizzie rejects him, he confronts his pride which in my opinion far exceeds a more static character like Colonel Brandon.

    1. We could have a whole tea time discussion on that which could last us well into happy hour. Colonel Brandon's static character is that of a man with a passionate heart restrained by the deep pain of the past. Yet even that does not stop him from loving again, even without hope. That's why I go back and forth. Fortunately my fictional fantasies don't require fidelity.

  6. I love Colonel Brandon as well. I also have a degree in psych and I love "character study" and social psych and what makes people tick. One definitely doesn't have to be a villain or scoundrel to be "dark".

    Great post! I enjoy your DJA site.

  7. - tweeted this

    - Twitter follower for Barbara and DJABC

    - Follower of DD blog